Toward low-complexity neural networks for failure management in optical networks
Khan, L.
;
Pedro, J. M.
; Ayoub, O.
; Costa, N.
; Sgambelluri, A.
; Marinis, L.
; Napoli, --
; Sambo, --
Journal of Optical Communications and Networking Vol. 17, Nº 7, pp. 555 - 555, June, 2025.
ISSN (print): 1943-0620
ISSN (online): 1943-0639
Scimago Journal Ranking: 1,12 (in 2025)
Digital Object Identifier: 10.1364/JOCN.550933
Abstract
Machine learning (ML) continues to show its potential and effi cacy in automating network management tasks, such as failure management. However, as ML deployment considerations broaden, aspects that go beyond pre- dictive performance, such as a model’s computational complexity (CC), start to gain signifi cance, as higher CC incurs higher costs and energy consumption. Balancing high predictive performance with reduced CC is an important aspect, and therefore, it needs more investigation, especially in the context of optical networks. In this work, we focus on the problem of reducing the CC of ML models, specifi cally neural networks (NNs), for the use case of failure identifi cation in optical networks. We propose an approach that exploits the relative activity of neurons in NNs to reduce their size (and hence, their CC). Our proposed approach, referred to as iterative neural removal (INR), iteratively computes neurons’ activity and removes neurons with no activity until reaching a predefi ned stopping condition. We also propose another approach, referred to as guided knowledge distillation (GKD), that combines INR with knowledge distillation (KD), a known technique for compression of NNs. GKD inherently determines the size of the compressed NN without requiring any manual suboptimal selection or other time-consuming optimization strategies, as in traditional KD. To quantify the effectiveness of INR and GKD, we evaluate their performance against pruning (i.e., a well-known NN compression technique) in terms of impact on predictive performance and reduction in CC and memory footprint. For the considered scenario, experimental results on testbed data show that INR and GKD are more effective than pruning in reducing CC and memory footprint.